Piedmont Historical Society's
Response to the Sidney Dearing's story
After a year of silence and many inquires later, they mention Sidney Dearing:
Pre-Covid-19, I had been in frequent communication with the main historian at the Piedmont Historical Society asking about our city's history unrelated to Sidney Dearing. In 2020 I created this website and the Dearing's story started getting more publicity. The following articles started mentioning Sidney's story, yet, the Piedmont Historical Society remained suspiciously quiet:
-
News: Uncovering Dearing: How Piedmont’s first Black homeowner was run out of town, and the lingering effects on the city’s history
By Marta Symkowick | Exedra | September 15, 2020 -
News: Where We Came From … Where We’re Going
Aya Troyer, Zenobia Pellissier Lloyd and Malia Lee | October 21, 2020 -
News: After Dearing: Residential segregation and the ongoing effects on Piedmont
Nick Levinson and Marta Symkowick |Exedra | October 27, 2020 -
News: A ‘full, layered, textured’ story: Being Black in Piedmont today
Nick Levinson and Marta Symkowick | Exedra | December 22, 2020 -
News: Piedmont residents wrestle with how to add more housing to exclusive enclave
Sarah Ravani | San Francisco Chronicle | May 20, 2021
I emailed the historical chair on 5/24/2021 hoping she would finally want to break her society's silence and talk about Sidney Dearing and his family's treatment here. I still have not heard back from her, however, my name was mentioned as well as this website in the first article where the PHS had finally mentioned Sidney Dearing on 7/13/2021 over a year later. Many people have asked on my behalf to set up a meeting and talk about Sidney, but I have still not heard back. For a society that wants people to learn about our town's history, I would have hoped they would have been a bit more involved early on and happy that so many people were suddenly interested in history - both good and bad from our town.
Historical Society's article in the Exedra on 7/13/2021:
And yet, Dearing is not mentioned in the Piedmont Historical Society’s newsletters, articles, and website. Until the actions of the summer of 2020 and the renewed interest in historic racism, I had not heard of Sidney Dearing. When reporters for the Exedra contacted me in June asking for information on Dearing, I gave them my “go-to” resources and then discovered for myself his shocking story. The newspapers.com website allows members to search newspaper articles throughout the country. In California, newspapers from Sacramento to Whittier published articles on Dearing, and the Oakland Tribune provided a wealth of material. Bennett has included these clippings and more on her website.
His story was available the whole time, his story was just not retold.
On the Historical Society's new Sidney Dearing page (September 2021), named "__trashed.html", it mentions Piedmont's local newspaper printing quite a few articles regarding Sidney and his treatment in Piedmont:
When Piedmont residents discovered that Sidney was Black, they wanted him to leave Piedmont. On March 14, 1924, the Piedmont Weekly News reported that residents protested to the Piedmont City Council the sale of the house to colored. The original deed for the house at 67 Wildwood Avenue had a clause prohibiting the sale to “any other than whites,” but the clause was said to have expired in 1923. The City Council was powerless to act and replied that it was a neighborhood matter. The Council suggested that the residents cooperate to buy Dearing out. Dearing soon began receiving letters demanding that he either sell or move away and rent his house to white people. Dearing refused.
[...]
Residents continued to demand that Dearing sell, and Dearing continued to refuse to sell. Handbills were posted around town calling for a meeting. The Piedmont Weekly News reported the gathering. On May 6, at 8 pm, a crowd of 500 Piedmont residents gathered in front of Dearing’s house and demanded that he sell his house and leave Piedmont. Dearing agreed to meet in one week to discuss arrangements for the sale of his house, and the crowd dispersed. It was the first time that Dearing had agreed to discuss the sale of his house.
[...]
On May 30, the Piedmont Weekly News published Mayor Ellsworth’s statement: “The question of building a street at this point has been considered for some time…The council has received many suggestions during the past two years that a street be built at this point.”
[...]
While the city prepared its condemnation case against Sidney Dearing, the Piedmont Weekly News reported on June 13, that Dearing moved his entire family back into his home at 67 Wildwood. In addition to his wife Irene and their two small children, Irene’s mother Julia Davis also moved into the house. Mrs. Davis was the original purchaser of the house. When interviewed, Mrs. Davis stated, “Mr. Dearing will not move until he gets his price… we are all living here again.”
[...]
On August 15, the Piedmont Weekly News reported that the City of Piedmont prevailed in the first hearing against Sidney Dearing. Attorney Drake filed three objections to the complaint, and Judge John D. Murphy overruled each. Piedmont City Attorney Richardson asked for a September 15 trial date.
