Redlining in Piedmont, California before 1968
"A Standard State Zoning Enabling Act" (SZEA) was a model law for U.S. states to enable zoning regulations in their jurisdictions. It was drafted by a committee of the Department of Commerce and first issued in 1922. This act was one of the foundational developments in land use planning in the United States. Landmark U.S. Supreme Court zoning cases, such as Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Company (1926), supported strongly exclusionary views toward African Americans and European immigrants. These exclusionary views prevailed, despite the fact that Buchanan v. Warley (1917) declared racial zoning unconstitutional in 1917. Unchallenged discriminatory ordinances allowed residential segregation to become entrenched (Haar and Kayden 1989: 41-42). Another method of maintaining racial segregation was the use of restrictive covenants, which are private contracts forbidding home sales and rentals to blacks or Jews. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a restrictive covenant in Corrigan v. Buckley (1926), the same year that it upheld Euclid v. Ambler (Randle 1989). For the purposes of racial control and segregation, zoning and racially restrictive covenants effectively perpetuated segregation by limiting housing opportunities for people of color.
One of the primary FHA criteria in judging whether investments should be insured was the racial composition of the neighborhoods. FHA's underwriting manuals described "the infiltration of inharmonious racial and nationality groups" as "adverse" to neighborhood stability. Appraisers were, therefore, advised to lower the rating of properties in mixed neighborhoods, often to the point of encouraging lending institutions to reject any loan applications from those areas. From 1937 to 1948, racially restrictive covenants helped secure and incentivize the ongoing activities of homeownership for whites. The FHA financed three out of every five homes purchased in the United States, yet less than 2 percent of FHA loans were made to nonwhite home buyers (Tobin 1987: 235; Rothstein 2017).
The Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) was established in 1937. HOLC developed the rating system to evaluate loan risks. The lowest of the four categories was outlined in red. The vast majority of mortgages went to the top two categories (blue and green), the highest of which included areas that were categorized by HOLC as "new" and homogenous. The second category consisted of areas that had reached their peak, but were still desirable and could be expected to remain stable (Massey and Denton 1993: 51; Jackson 1987: 196).
When the U.S. Congress abolished the PWA and adopted the Housing Act of 1937, the U.S. Housing Authority took over the development of public housing, this time by making subsidies to developers rather than by directly constructing and managing the housing units. The principle of segregation continued to be applied. Often, integrated neighborhoods were replaced with housing projects that were for whites only. That meant the African American residents were displaced and had to look for housing in more crowded neighborhoods. Thus, the federal government actively created a housing crisis for African Americans at the time it was solving the crisis for whites.
Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (also known as the Fair Housing Act) may be the most viable solution to remedy the unconstitutional federal housing polices and procedures that created residentially segregated communities and homeownership opportunities for African Americans.
Fair Housing Act read in part (24 CFR §100.50 (b):
It shall be unlawful to (1) Refuse to sell or rent a dwelling ... because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin, or to discriminate in the sale or rental of a dwelling because of handicap (2) Discriminate in the terms, conditions or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling .... (3) Engage in any conduct relating to the provision of housing which otherwise makes unavailable or denies dwellings to persons .... Or (6) Engage in blockbusting practices in connection with the sale or rental of dwellings because of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
Blockbusting is a practice by which real estate agents and mortgage brokers have profited from racism (Heiman 1987). For decades after World War I, agents were restricted by laws or by covenants in deeds from showing houses in white neighborhoods to black clients. But when restrictive covenants became illegal in the 1950s, the real estate industry adopted a new tactic. If a black family moved into a white neighborhood, some agents and brokers would engage in scare tactics to convince other white homeowners to sell their properties at a deep discount below market value. The buyer would then sell the same house to a black family at a price above market value, which the black family would pay because of restrictions on the neighborhoods in which they could live.1 The practice not only cheated both white sellers and black buyers, it also led to rapid resegregation of neighborhoods. Blockbusting became illegal in 1968 as part of the Fair Housing Act (24 CFR §100.85). Despite the law, the practice still continues (Oleen 2016).
The History of Residential Segregation in the United States, Title VIII, and the Homeownership Remedy
Teran McGrew MS, PhD First published 29 October 2018 link here
"Piedmont, according to a 1937 document from the Home Owner’s Loan Corporation, was a “favorable” place to build and make loans because of characteristics such as “landscaped streets” and “Racial restrictions.” That year, Piedmont had no Black residents. Although the practice was outlawed by the Fair Housing Act of 1968, the city was, and remains, predominantly white. According to the 2010 U.S. Census, Piedmont is approximately 72 percent White, 17 percent Asian, almost 4 percent Hispanic or Latino, and 2 percent Black/African-American. By contrast, in the surrounding city of Oakland, White, Hispanic/ Latino and Black/African-American each make up about one quarter of the population. Asians are 16 percent."
From Piedmont Exedra's Will Callan | January 25, 2020
Abandonment Disaster Demonstration Relief Act of 1975
Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Housing and Urban Affairs of the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session on S. 1988
Oakland, Calif., August 28, 1975, Los Angeles, Calif., August 29, 1975 By United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Subcommittee on Housing and Urban Affairs · 1975 Full read here
The San Francisco Examiner - Thu, Aug 6, 1992
Piedmont Advertising Race Restrictions
"Build-back and race restrictions"
Ad in the Oakland Tribune (Oakland, California)
05 Oct 1924, Sun - Page 38
"Building and race restrictions"
Oakland Tribune (Oakland, California)
17 Aug 1919, Sun - Page 18
Sidney Moving was an "Improvement"
The Importance of Being Urban -
DESIGNING THE PROGRESSIVE SCHOOL DISTRICT, 1890-1940
by DAVID A. GAMSON. 2019. Page 134
"The matter of condemning the Dearing property and building this street will be for the improvement of the city as well as to make (Sidney) move from Piedmont."
The Mayor of Piedmont, Oliver Ellsworth
Oakland Tribune - Oakland, California
29 May 1924, Thu • Page 6
The 1920s Census
To give you an idea of what the demographics were like in Piedmont in the 1920s (4 years before Sidney bought a house) you have to dig into the census and understand what the categories were and who lived in Piedmont at the time. In the 1920 Census, the enumerators were to enter "W" for White, "B" for Black, "Mu" for mulatto, "Ch" for Chinese, "Jp" for Japanese, "In" for American Indian, or "Ot" for other races. The definition for “B” and “Mu” is: “For census purposes, the term ‘‘black’’ (B) includes all persons who are evidently full blooded “black”, while the term ‘‘mulatto’’ (Mu) includes all other persons having some proportion or perceptible trace of “black” blood.” (Source: Pew Research Center)
According to the 1920 census of Piedmont, California (source: Ancestry.com) there were 4,195 White, 47 Japanese, 28 Chinese, 7 Mulatto, and 6 Black persons living in our town. No American Indian or Other races were listed as living in Piedmont. A total of 339 people were listed as Servants, 114 as Maids, 103 Cooks, 14 House Keepers, 14 Butlers, 3 House Boys, 2 Child Nurses, 1 Stable Boy and 1 Chore boy. For purposes of this site I only looked at the "Black" and "Mulatto" races listed. Here are the names of the 13 People of Color living in Piedmont in 1920:
Causy P Baker (widow) - 213 Mountain Avenue
Emma Hall, 38 years old, House Maid, "Black"
Michael J Brophy - 332 Sheridan Avenue
Mattie Hunt, 33 years old, Cook, "Mulatto"
Charles H Brown - 55 Manor Drive
Mildred Hawkins, 20 years old, House Maid, "Black"
Alexander Chalmers - 576 Park Way
Adeline Tenpelete, 20 years old, House Maid, "Mulatto"
Daniel Crosby - 105 Sheridan Avenue
Orine O Branford, 43 years old, Cook, "Mulatto"
Robert Branford, 14 years old, Chore Boy, "Mulatto"
Ward Dawson - 304 Hillside Avenue
Capitola Beal, 46 years old, Nurse, "Black"
John F Humburg - 38 Monte Avenue
Harriet Lewis, 27 years old, House Maid, "Black"
J Bryant Grimwood - 419 Pala Avenue
Georgie Verbi, 44 years old, Cook, "Black"
Thomas E Morgan - 114 Dracena Avenue
Lee Grace, 52 years old, Cook, "Mulatto"
Leila B Stoddard - 126 Hillside Avenue
Laura Hayes, 52 years old, Cook, "Mulatto"
Edward White - 47 Estrella Avenue
Mattie Gordon, 28 years old, House Servant, "Black"
Oakland Tribune - Fri - Feb 10, 1922
Two years later a newer family was living there requesting a new (white) house maid.
Oakland Tribune - Tue - Jul 25, 1911
Most likely previous owners and not the Grimwoods
Oakland Tribune - Sun - Mar 28, 1915
The next Black homeowner in Piedmont
The US Census happens every 10 years. 1930 and 1940s census are available however, the 1950 Census will not be released until April of 2022. According to the "72-Year Rule," the National Archives releases census records to the general public 72 years after Census Day. As a result, the 1930 census records were released April 1, 2002, and the 1940 records were released April 2, 2012. The 1950 census records will be released in April 2022. For Piedmont in 1930 and 1940 censuses do not show anyone who is Black (census recorded as “Negro”) as head of household and owners. 2 people were listed in 1930 and they lived in additional units on their boss’ property. I have not been able to find the "next" Person of Color who owned their house in Piedmont, yet.
The next Person of Color I could find living in Piedmont and the first to graduate from PHS was Tom Williamson, graduate of the class of 1964. He was inducted into the Piedmont Sports Hall of Fame in 2005 by my grandmother's second husband and Piedmont High's Football Coach, Bob Muenter. Tom Williamson, Jr.'s parents were Thomas and Winifred Williamson and their children were the first of Color in Piedmont's school system.
Thomas S. Williamson, Jr. was born on July 14, 1946 in Plainfield, New Jersey. His parents, Mrs. Winifred Hall Williamson and the late United States Army Lieutenant Colonel Thomas S. Williamson, Sr. -- one of the first black officers to command white troops in the U.S. military-- were later stationed in Yokohama, Japan where young Tom reportedly spoke Japanese before he spoke English. The family ultimately settled just east of the San Francisco Bay in Piedmont, California where Tom grew up with his two younger siblings -- his late brother George and his sister Brenda. They integrated to Piedmont and experienced the vicissitudes it brought with the mix of well-meaning and less well-meaning neighbors, classmates and teachers. [Source]
<There could possibly be a previous person of color but I have not found them, yet>
The San Francisco Examiner - Fri - Oct. 9, 1959
Oakland Tribune - Thu - May 30, 1963
Oakland Tribune - Fri - Oct. 9, 1959
Oakland Tribune - Sun - May 29, 1949
Possibly who sold the house to the Williamson Family
Fair Housing Act of 1968
The Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibited discrimination concerning the sale, rental and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin or sex.
California Proposition 14 was a November 1964 ballot proposition that amended the California state constitution, nullifying the Rumford Fair Housing Act. Proposition 14 was declared unconstitutional by the California Supreme Court in 1966. The decision of the California Supreme Court was affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1967 in Reitman v. Mulkey.